freemcplab / 目錄 / 演練場 / Harness (Meta-skill)

● 社群 revfactory ⚡ 即開即用

Harness (Meta-skill)

Name: Harness (Meta-skill) (Claude Skill)
Author: revfactory

A meta-skill: tell it your domain, it designs the agent team for you (roles, prompts, hand-offs) and saves the specs for reuse.

Harness treats agent design as a first-class workflow: you describe your domain (incident response, content review, code triage); it asks the right questions, then emits a documented team — roles, system prompts, when each takes over, and shared memory boundaries.

▶ 觀看演示 📦 安裝 💡 使用場景

為什麼要用

核心特性

Interview-driven team design
Outputs role specs as Markdown
Defines hand-off rules between agents
Specifies shared vs private memory
Versioned team definitions
Reuse across projects

即時演示

實際使用效果

就緒

安裝

作者儲存庫 · Claude Skills 官方文件

使用場景

實戰用法： Harness (Meta-skill)

Design an incident-response agent team

👤 Claude Code users ⏱ ~15 min intermediate

何時使用： You want multiple agents (triage, comms, scribe) cooperating on real incidents instead of one big system prompt.

步驟

Brief

Tell harness: "incident response, B2B SaaS, 3 specialists please."✓ 已複製

→ Harness asks scope questions
Answer

Define escalation, channels, scribe duties.✓ 已複製

→ Spec drafts emerge
Save

Save specs into /agents/incident/.✓ 已複製

→ Reusable team def written

結果： Documented multi-agent team you can rerun next incident, not a one-off prompt.

組合

與其他 MCP 搭配，撬動十倍槓桿

harness-skill + filesystem

Save designed teams alongside your project

Combine harness-skill with filesystem: Save designed teams alongside your project✓ 已複製

工具

此 MCP 暴露的能力

工具	輸入參數	何時呼叫	成本
design	(see docs)	Run the design interview	1 call
review	(see docs)	Critique an existing team for missing roles or unclear hand-offs	1 call

成本與限制

運行它的成本

API 配額: N/A
每次呼叫 Token 數: Interview is moderate
費用: Free skill
提示: Reuse outputs as-is for next domain; don't redesign from scratch

安全

權限、密鑰、影響範圍

最小權限： fs-read fs-write

憑證儲存： None

資料出站： None

故障排查

常見錯誤與修復

Output too generic

Provide concrete examples (real past incidents) during the interview

替代方案