/ 目录 / 演练场 / design-cognition-skill
● 社区 S0ulFood ⚡ 即开即用

design-cognition-skill

作者 S0ulFood · S0ulFood/design-cognition-skill

Four-role design-thinking framework (Strategist, Researcher, Executor, Critic) for Claude Code — works for any domain, not just product design.

A domain-agnostic design-thinking skill. Claude plays four roles in sequence: Strategist (what matters), Researcher (what's true), Executor (what to build), Critic (what's wrong). Useful for any non-trivial decision — features, essays, architecture, roadmaps.

为什么要用

核心特性

实时演示

实际使用效果

design-cognition-skill.replay ▶ 就绪
0/0

安装

作者仓库 · Claude Skills 官方文档

使用场景

实战用法: design-cognition-skill

Decide whether and how to ship a feature

👤 Product managers, founders ⏱ ~60 min intermediate

何时使用: You're weighing a feature and the team's split.

步骤
  1. Strategist
    Use design-cognition-skill. Strategist role: should we build [feature]? What are the strategic tradeoffs?✓ 已复制
    → Strategic framing — not just pros/cons, but tradeoffs against stated goals
  2. Researcher
    Researcher role: what's known from our data, users, competitors?✓ 已复制
    → Evidence summary with gaps noted
  3. Executor
    Executor role: if we build it, what's the smallest valuable version?✓ 已复制
    → Concrete MVP definition
  4. Critic
    Critic role: what's wrong with this plan? Be harsh.✓ 已复制
    → Specific pushback, not generic risk flags

结果: A decision doc you can share that shows the thinking, not just the conclusion.

注意事项
  • Roles blur together — Run each role in its own prompt; don't ask for all four at once
搭配使用: filesystem

Get four kinds of feedback on a draft essay

👤 Writers ⏱ ~20 min beginner

何时使用: Your essay needs more than 'looks good' or copy-editing.

步骤
  1. Run each role on the draft
    Use design-cognition-skill on my essay. Strategist (is the point worth making?), Researcher (are claims defensible?), Executor (is the structure tight?), Critic (what would a hostile reader attack?).✓ 已复制
    → Four distinct critiques

结果: Feedback a friend wouldn't give you but a good editor would.

组合

与其他 MCP 搭配,撬动十倍杠杆

design-cognition-skill + filesystem

Save each role's output as a separate doc

Save outputs to decision/<topic>/<role>.md for each role.✓ 已复制
design-cognition-skill + infinite-gratitude-skill

Pair with multi-agent research for breadth plus this for depth

Use infinite-gratitude for discovery, then design-cognition for the final decision doc.✓ 已复制

工具

此 MCP 暴露的能力

工具输入参数何时调用成本
strategist question What matters here 0
researcher question + context What's true 0
executor direction What to build 0
critic plan or artifact What's wrong 0

成本与限制

运行它的成本

API 配额
None
每次调用 Token 数
Moderate — 4 roles, each non-trivial
费用
Free
提示
Invoke single roles when you only need one lens.

安全

权限、密钥、影响范围

凭据存储: None
数据出站: None from skill

故障排查

常见错误与修复

Critic is too gentle

Prompt for adversarial framing — 'what would a hostile VC attack'

Roles produce same content

Separate into 4 prompts; prime each role explicitly

替代方案

design-cognition-skill 对比其他方案

替代方案何时用它替代权衡
Single prompt asking for 'pros and cons'Quick vibe checkNo structure; easy to skip hard questions
planning-with-files-skillYou need session persistence across a long projectNot a decision framework

更多

资源

📖 阅读 GitHub 上的官方 README

🐙 查看未解决的 issue

🔍 浏览全部 400+ MCP 服务器和 Skills