/ Diretório / Playground / medsci-skills
● Comunidade Aperivue ⚡ Instantâneo

medsci-skills

por Aperivue · Aperivue/medsci-skills

23 Claude Code skills built by a physician for the full medical research pipeline — literature search, protocol, stats, figures, IMRAD manuscript, reviewer response.

MedSci Skills covers the end-to-end clinical research workflow: literature search with verified citations, sample-size calculation, de-identification, stats code in Python/R for 13+ designs, PRISMA/STROBE/STARD compliance, publication figures, full IMRAD manuscripts, reviewer-response frameworks, and journal recommendation. Built with anti-hallucination citation discipline.

Por que usar

Principais recursos

Demo ao vivo

Como fica na prática

medsci-skill.replay ▶ pronto
0/0

Instalar

Escolha seu cliente

~/Library/Application Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.json  · Windows: %APPDATA%\Claude\claude_desktop_config.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "medsci-skill": {
      "command": "git",
      "args": [
        "clone",
        "https://github.com/Aperivue/medsci-skills",
        "~/.claude/skills/medsci-skills"
      ],
      "_inferred": true
    }
  }
}

Abra Claude Desktop → Settings → Developer → Edit Config. Reinicie após salvar.

~/.cursor/mcp.json · .cursor/mcp.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "medsci-skill": {
      "command": "git",
      "args": [
        "clone",
        "https://github.com/Aperivue/medsci-skills",
        "~/.claude/skills/medsci-skills"
      ],
      "_inferred": true
    }
  }
}

Cursor usa o mesmo esquema mcpServers que o Claude Desktop. Config de projeto vence a global.

VS Code → Cline → MCP Servers → Edit
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "medsci-skill": {
      "command": "git",
      "args": [
        "clone",
        "https://github.com/Aperivue/medsci-skills",
        "~/.claude/skills/medsci-skills"
      ],
      "_inferred": true
    }
  }
}

Clique no ícone MCP Servers na barra lateral do Cline, depois "Edit Configuration".

~/.codeium/windsurf/mcp_config.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "medsci-skill": {
      "command": "git",
      "args": [
        "clone",
        "https://github.com/Aperivue/medsci-skills",
        "~/.claude/skills/medsci-skills"
      ],
      "_inferred": true
    }
  }
}

Mesmo formato do Claude Desktop. Reinicie o Windsurf para aplicar.

~/.continue/config.json
{
  "mcpServers": [
    {
      "name": "medsci-skill",
      "command": "git",
      "args": [
        "clone",
        "https://github.com/Aperivue/medsci-skills",
        "~/.claude/skills/medsci-skills"
      ]
    }
  ]
}

O Continue usa um array de objetos de servidor em vez de um map.

~/.config/zed/settings.json
{
  "context_servers": {
    "medsci-skill": {
      "command": {
        "path": "git",
        "args": [
          "clone",
          "https://github.com/Aperivue/medsci-skills",
          "~/.claude/skills/medsci-skills"
        ]
      }
    }
  }
}

Adicione em context_servers. Zed recarrega automaticamente ao salvar.

claude mcp add medsci-skill -- git clone https://github.com/Aperivue/medsci-skills ~/.claude/skills/medsci-skills

Uma linha só. Verifique com claude mcp list. Remova com claude mcp remove.

Casos de uso

Usos do mundo real: medsci-skills

Draft a STROBE-compliant observational study manuscript

👤 Clinical researchers with a cleaned dataset and ready to write ⏱ ~120 min advanced

Quando usar: You have analyses done and need to turn them into a submittable IMRAD manuscript.

Pré-requisitos
  • Cleaned, de-identified dataset + analysis outputs — Use the de-identification and stats skills first if not done
  • Skill installed — git clone https://github.com/Aperivue/medsci-skills ~/.claude/skills/medsci-skills
Fluxo
  1. Draft methods and results from outputs
    Use medsci-skills. Here are my analysis outputs and study design (retrospective cohort). Draft the Methods and Results sections, STROBE-compliant.✓ Copiado
    → Full drafts with STROBE item mapping
  2. Run compliance audit
    Now audit this manuscript against the STROBE checklist — flag every missing item.✓ Copiado
    → Table: item / present? / note
  3. Self-review from reviewer perspective
    Now critique this manuscript as a reviewer at the target journal would. Be harsh.✓ Copiado
    → Numbered critique with line-level references

Resultado: A manuscript that clears a reporting-guideline audit and has been stress-tested before submission.

Armadilhas
  • Citations that look right but don't exist — The skill enforces verification — never accept a citation you can't open in PubMed
Combine com: arxiv · biomcp

Run a PRISMA-compliant systematic review pipeline

👤 Researchers starting a systematic review / meta-analysis ⏱ ~240 min advanced

Quando usar: You're beginning a PRISMA-guided review.

Fluxo
  1. Build search strategy and fetch
    Use medsci-skills to design a PRISMA search for '<topic>'. Run it against PubMed and Europe PMC.✓ Copiado
    → Boolean strategy + hit counts per database
  2. Screen and extract
    For the included studies, extract into the meta-analysis pipeline format.✓ Copiado
    → Structured extraction table
  3. Generate PRISMA flow diagram and forest plot
    Now generate the PRISMA diagram and forest plot figures at journal resolution.✓ Copiado
    → PDF/PNG figures ready to paste

Resultado: A compliant SR manuscript scaffold with figures.

Armadilhas
  • Over-inclusive search returns 10k+ hits — Tighten terms with the skill's query-refinement helper
Combine com: arxiv

Calculate sample size with an IRB-ready justification paragraph

👤 PIs preparing an ethics submission ⏱ ~15 min intermediate

Quando usar: Before IRB review, when you need the stats justification done right.

Fluxo
  1. Specify effect size, alpha, power
    Use medsci-skills sample-size. Design: two-arm RCT. Primary outcome: continuous, expected difference 0.3 SD, alpha 0.05, power 0.8, 1:1 allocation.✓ Copiado
    → N per arm + the formula + an IRB-ready paragraph

Resultado: A justification block you can paste into the protocol.

Draft point-by-point responses to reviewer comments

👤 Authors preparing a revision ⏱ ~45 min intermediate

Quando usar: You got R1 reviews back and need a disciplined response.

Fluxo
  1. Structure the response letter
    Here are the reviewer comments. Use medsci-skills to draft a point-by-point response — quote comment, response, revised manuscript location.✓ Copiado
    → Structured table-like response with line refs

Resultado: A cover letter editors will thank you for.

Armadilhas
  • Agreeing with every comment and weakening the paper — Ask the skill to push back on comments you disagree with, with evidence

Combinações

Combine com outros MCPs para 10× de alavancagem

medsci-skill + arxiv + biomcp

Pull primary literature with verifiable IDs for citations

Use biomcp + medsci-skills literature-search to find RCTs on <topic> from 2020–2025.✓ Copiado
medsci-skill + filesystem

Keep protocol / manuscript / figures / stats in one versioned folder

Create project structure per medsci-skills conventions and initialize git.✓ Copiado

Ferramentas

O que este MCP expõe

FerramentaEntradasQuando chamarCusto
literature-search topic, databases Start of any research task 0
sample-size design, effect size, alpha, power Protocol writing 0
deidentify clinical dataset Before any data work 0
stats-code design, data structure Analysis phase 0
manuscript-imrad outputs, design Writing phase 0
compliance-audit manuscript, guideline (STROBE/PRISMA/…) Pre-submission 0
journal-recommender manuscript Picking where to submit 0
reviewer-response reviews, manuscript Revision phase 0

Custo e limites

O que custa rodar

Cota de API
None from the skill itself
Tokens por chamada
Large — manuscript drafts run 10–30k tokens
Monetário
Free, OSS
Dica
Draft with a smaller model, polish with Opus — the 2-pass approach halves spend

Segurança

Permissões, segredos, alcance

Armazenamento de credenciais: No credentials stored; any DB API keys (PubMed, etc.) read from env
Saída de dados: Only to databases you configure — PubMed, arXiv, etc. Never send PHI to external LLMs without de-identification.

Solução de problemas

Erros comuns e correções

literature-search returns no results

Broaden terms; the skill defaults to strict Boolean

Compliance audit flags many items as missing

That's expected on a first draft — work through them in order of severity

Alternativas

medsci-skills vs. outros

AlternativaQuando usarTroca
biomcpYou mainly need biomedical data retrieval without the manuscript layerLess writing support
arxivPre-prints onlyNo medical guideline compliance

Mais

Recursos

📖 Leia o README oficial no GitHub

🐙 Ver issues abertas

🔍 Ver todos os 400+ servidores MCP e Skills