Tackle a research question single-agent prompts fail on
使うタイミング: Questions that need breadth (many sources) and depth (skepticism, synthesis) — where one pass hallucinates.
前提条件
- Skill installed — git clone https://github.com/sstklen/infinite-gratitude ~/.claude/skills/infinite-gratitude
フロー
-
Pose the questionUse infinite-gratitude. Research question: what are the real bottlenecks in scaling post-transformer architectures in 2026? Run the 10-agent dojo.✓ コピーしました→ Roles spin up: explorer, critic, synthesizer, etc., each producing a distinct contribution
-
Watch the handoffsShow me the critic's pushback on the explorer's output.✓ コピーしました→ Substantive critique, not agreement
-
Final synthesisGive me the synthesizer's final artifact with dissent noted.✓ コピーしました→ Document with main thesis + minority views preserved
結果: A research brief richer than a single-agent answer.
注意点
- Agents converge and critic rubber-stamps — Prompt the critic explicitly to find flaws; force disagreement